PWRMF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
71.63M
VLTLF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
25.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWRMF vs VLTLF

Header iconPWRMF vs VLTLF Comparison
Open Charts PWRMF vs VLTLFBanner chart's image
Power Metals
Price$0.46
Change-$0.01 (-2.13%)
Volume$89.88K
Capitalization71.63M
LibertyStream Infrastructure Partners
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Volume$66.03K
Capitalization25.8M
PWRMF vs VLTLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PWRMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWRMF vs. VLTLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWRMF is a Hold and VLTLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PWRMF: $0.46 vs. VLTLF: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: PWRMF and VLTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWRMF: 56% vs. VLTLF: 42%
Market capitalization -- PWRMF: $71.63M vs. VLTLF: $25.8M
PWRMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $71.63M. VLTLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $25.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWRMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PWRMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLTLF is a better buy in the long-term than PWRMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWRMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLTLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWRMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VLTLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWRMF is a better buy in the short-term than VLTLF.

Price Growth

PWRMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.77% price change this week, while VLTLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWRMF($71.6M) has a higher market cap than VLTLF($25.8M). PWRMF YTD gains are higher at: 45.349 vs. VLTLF (-24.552). PWRMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.07M vs. VLTLF (-4.55M). VLTLF has more cash in the bank: 1.77M vs. PWRMF (849K). PWRMF (0) and VLTLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PWRMFVLTLFPWRMF / VLTLF
Capitalization71.6M25.8M278%
EBITDA-2.07M-4.55M46%
Gain YTD45.349-24.552-185%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash849K1.77M48%
Total DebtN/A320K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PWRMF vs VLTLF: Fundamental Ratings
PWRMF
VLTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
653
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6191
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLTLF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PWRMF (62). This means that VLTLF’s stock grew similarly to PWRMF’s over the last 12 months.

PWRMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as VLTLF (100). This means that PWRMF’s stock grew similarly to VLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

PWRMF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as VLTLF (99). This means that PWRMF’s stock grew similarly to VLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

PWRMF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as VLTLF (91). This means that PWRMF’s stock grew similarly to VLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

VLTLF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PWRMF (100). This means that VLTLF’s stock grew significantly faster than PWRMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWRMFVLTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWRMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPXGY10.330.02
+0.19%
Japan Exchange Group, Inc.
SSBP10.25N/A
N/A
SSB Bancorp Inc.
ZEOOY9.73N/A
N/A
Zeon Corp.
EXSPF1.79N/A
N/A
EXPERT AI SPA
IRRXU2.05N/A
N/A
Integrated Rail and Resources Acquisition Corp.

PWRMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PWRMF and ERLFF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PWRMF and ERLFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWRMF
1D Price
Change %
PWRMF100%
-0.96%
ERLFF - PWRMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
VLTLF - PWRMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+12.14%
PILBF - PWRMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
REEMF - PWRMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
PUTKY - PWRMF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
More

VLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLTLF and AVLNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLTLF and AVLNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLTLF
1D Price
Change %
VLTLF100%
+12.14%
AVLNF - VLTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.74%
NBMFF - VLTLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.34%
PWRMF - VLTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
EVKRF - VLTLF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
FCLIF - VLTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More