Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PWTAX vs RLBGX
PWTAX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts PWTAX vs RLBGX
UBS US Allocation A
Price$49.14
Change-$0.43 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.64M
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$35.65
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PWTAX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PWTAX vs. RLBGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWTAX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PWTAX (212M). RLBGX pays higher dividends than PWTAX: RLBGX (2.23) vs PWTAX (1.62). PWTAX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: PWTAX (32 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). PWTAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). PWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTAX: RLBGX (250) vs PWTAX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. PWTAX (-0.08). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.35 vs. PWTAX (8.61).
| PWTAX | RLBGX | PWTAX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.25 | 416% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.25 | 416% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.306 | 4.592 | 7% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 244B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.23 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | 5.63 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.26 | 33.78 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.61 | 40.35 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.37 | 60.87 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement