PXPHF
Price
$6.05
Change
+$0.43 (+7.65%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
651.64M
RPMT
Price
$0.38
Change
-$0.02 (-5.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
47.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PXPHF vs RPMT

Header iconPXPHF vs RPMT Comparison
Open Charts PXPHF vs RPMTBanner chart's image
Pexip Hldg ASA
Price$6.05
Change+$0.43 (+7.65%)
Volume$12.5K
Capitalization651.64M
Rego Payment Architectures
Price$0.38
Change-$0.02 (-5.00%)
Volume$30.53K
Capitalization47.69M
PXPHF vs RPMT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PXPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RPMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PXPHF vs. RPMT commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PXPHF is a Hold and RPMT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PXPHF: $6.05 vs. RPMT: $0.38)
Brand notoriety: PXPHF and RPMT are both not notable
PXPHF represents the Packaged Software, while RPMT is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PXPHF: 616% vs. RPMT: 46%
Market capitalization -- PXPHF: $651.64M vs. RPMT: $47.69M
PXPHF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $651.64M. RPMT’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $47.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $317.71B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.73T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PXPHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRPMT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PXPHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RPMT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PXPHF is a better buy in the long-term than RPMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PXPHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPMT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PXPHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RPMT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PXPHF is a better buy in the short-term than RPMT.

Price Growth

PXPHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RPMT (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.71%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+3.17% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PXPHF($652M) has a higher market cap than RPMT($47.7M). PXPHF YTD gains are higher at: 66.209 vs. RPMT (-59.518). PXPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 305M vs. RPMT (-7.81M). PXPHF has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. RPMT (1.9M). RPMT has less debt than PXPHF: RPMT (20.7M) vs PXPHF (54.8M). PXPHF has higher revenues than RPMT: PXPHF (1.19B) vs RPMT (0).
PXPHFRPMTPXPHF / RPMT
Capitalization652M47.7M1,367%
EBITDA305M-7.81M-3,904%
Gain YTD66.209-59.518-111%
P/E Ratio36.96N/A-
Revenue1.19B0-
Total Cash544M1.9M28,601%
Total Debt54.8M20.7M265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RPMT: Fundamental Ratings
RPMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PXPHFRPMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PXPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RPMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALFFF0.75N/A
N/A
Alfa S.A.B de C.V
ESBS7.32N/A
N/A
ES Bancshares, Inc.
WIGBY75.98N/A
N/A
Wisetech Global
ACITF0.20N/A
N/A
Asian Citrus Holdings Ltd.
SHANF0.31N/A
N/A
Shandong Molomg Petroleum Machinery Co., Ltd.

PXPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PXPHF and NPACY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PXPHF and NPACY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PXPHF
1D Price
Change %
PXPHF100%
N/A
NPACY - PXPHF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAPPF - PXPHF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEOJF - PXPHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRXXF - PXPHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPMT - PXPHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.88%
More

RPMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RPMT and RKNEF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RPMT and RKNEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RPMT
1D Price
Change %
RPMT100%
-4.88%
RKNEF - RPMT
14%
Poorly correlated
-8.51%
QIFTF - RPMT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSASF - RPMT
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.73%
PXPHF - RPMT
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROWKF - RPMT
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
More