PYHOF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
175.22M
YAMCF
Price
$7.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
6.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PYHOF vs YAMCF

Header iconPYHOF vs YAMCF Comparison
Open Charts PYHOF vs YAMCFBanner chart's image
Playmates Holdings
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$5.42K
Capitalization175.22M
Yamaha
Price$7.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$252
Capitalization6.55B
PYHOF vs YAMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PYHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YAMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PYHOF vs. YAMCF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYHOF is a Hold and YAMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PYHOF: $0.06 vs. YAMCF: $7.03)
Brand notoriety: PYHOF and YAMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PYHOF: 135% vs. YAMCF: 70%
Market capitalization -- PYHOF: $175.22M vs. YAMCF: $6.55B
PYHOF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $175.22M. YAMCF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $6.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PYHOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYAMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PYHOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YAMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PYHOF is a better buy in the long-term than YAMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PYHOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YAMCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PYHOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • YAMCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PYHOF and YAMCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PYHOF (@Recreational Products) experienced а -1.37% price change this week, while YAMCF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.29% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YAMCF($6.55B) has a higher market cap than PYHOF($175M). PYHOF YTD gains are higher at: 103.125 vs. YAMCF (0.739). YAMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 75.4B vs. PYHOF (-1.22M). YAMCF has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. PYHOF (1.6B). PYHOF has less debt than YAMCF: PYHOF (760M) vs YAMCF (28.4B). YAMCF has higher revenues than PYHOF: YAMCF (403B) vs PYHOF (912M).
PYHOFYAMCFPYHOF / YAMCF
Capitalization175M6.55B3%
EBITDA-1.22M75.4B-0%
Gain YTD103.1250.73913,947%
P/E RatioN/A24.33-
Revenue912M403B0%
Total Cash1.6B148B1%
Total Debt760M28.4B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PYHOF vs YAMCF: Fundamental Ratings
PYHOF
YAMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9720
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9198
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4175
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
479
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PYHOF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (34). This means that PYHOF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

PYHOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (100). This means that PYHOF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

PYHOF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (98). This means that PYHOF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

PYHOF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YAMCF (75). This means that PYHOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.

YAMCF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYHOF (47). This means that YAMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PYHOFYAMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PYHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YAMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEMGX14.030.08
+0.57%
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
JCNAX28.89N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Contrarian A
GMVIX16.48N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity Inv
DGEFX13.72N/A
N/A
Destinations Equity Income I
UPAAX14.84N/A
N/A
Upright Assets Allocation Plus

PYHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PYHOF and VIVC have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PYHOF and VIVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PYHOF
1D Price
Change %
PYHOF100%
-1.37%
VIVC - PYHOF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THLPF - PYHOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YAMCF - PYHOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNNY - PYHOF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
PMTYF - PYHOF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YAMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YAMCF has been loosely correlated with CGROF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YAMCF jumps, then CGROF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YAMCF
1D Price
Change %
YAMCF100%
N/A
CGROF - YAMCF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GDHG - YAMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.69%
PYHOF - YAMCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
SNMSF - YAMCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
THUPY - YAMCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More