PYPL
Price
$69.25
Change
+$0.32 (+0.46%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
65.85B
24 days until earnings call
WU
Price
$8.01
Change
-$0.05 (-0.62%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.6B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PYPL vs WU

Header iconPYPL vs WU Comparison
Open Charts PYPL vs WUBanner chart's image
PayPal Holdings
Price$69.25
Change+$0.32 (+0.46%)
Volume$12.22M
Capitalization65.85B
Western Union Company (The)
Price$8.01
Change-$0.05 (-0.62%)
Volume$59.32M
Capitalization2.6B
PYPL vs WU Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PYPL vs. WU commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYPL is a StrongBuy and WU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PYPL: $69.25 vs. WU: $8.01)
Brand notoriety: PYPL: Notable vs. WU: Not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PYPL: 104% vs. WU: 589%
Market capitalization -- PYPL: $65.85B vs. WU: $2.6B
PYPL [@Savings Banks] is valued at $65.85B. WU’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $671.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PYPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PYPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WU is a better buy in the long-term than PYPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PYPL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PYPL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PYPL is a better buy in the short-term than WU.

Price Growth

PYPL (@Savings Banks) experienced а +2.90% price change this week, while WU (@Savings Banks) price change was +0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

PYPL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

WU is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.48% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PYPL($65.9B) has a higher market cap than WU($2.6B). PYPL has higher P/E ratio than WU: PYPL (14.76) vs WU (3.05). WU (-18.282) and PYPL (-18.864) have similar YTD gains . PYPL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.26B vs. WU (891M). WU has less debt than PYPL: WU (2.75B) vs PYPL (11.3B). PYPL has higher revenues than WU: PYPL (32.3B) vs WU (4.1B).
PYPLWUPYPL / WU
Capitalization65.9B2.6B2,532%
EBITDA7.26B891M815%
Gain YTD-18.864-18.282103%
P/E Ratio14.763.05483%
Revenue32.3B4.1B787%
Total Cash10BN/A-
Total Debt11.3B2.75B411%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PYPL vs WU: Fundamental Ratings
PYPL
WU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
563
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5980
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7693
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WU's Valuation (20) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PYPL (83) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that WU’s stock grew somewhat faster than PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

WU's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that WU’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

WU's SMR Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PYPL (41) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that WU’s stock grew similarly to PYPL’s over the last 12 months.

PYPL's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as WU (80) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

PYPL's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as WU (93) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PYPL’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PYPLWU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PYPL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIM78.010.52
+0.68%
WisdomTree International MidCap Div ETF
DEEP36.380.24
+0.65%
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
SCHJ24.90-0.02
-0.08%
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
NAUG28.98-0.08
-0.26%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buffr ETF - Aug
FDN277.91-2.00
-0.71%
First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF