Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMEBX
PYVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMEBX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$16.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.68
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
PYVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. PYVAX (1.03B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMEBX (1.11) vs PYVAX (0.85). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PYVAX (1.01). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMEBX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. PYVAX (-3.69). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.14 vs. PYVAX (9.19).
| PYVAX | RMEBX | PYVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.100 | 9.293 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 108B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.69 | 10.92 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.83 | 25.02 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.19 | 53.14 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.02 | 74.65 | 58% |