Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMEBX
PYVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMEBX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$17.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.89
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
PYVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PYVAX (1.04B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMEBX (1.11) vs PYVAX (0.85). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PYVAX (1.01). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMEBX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.81 vs. PYVAX (-6.60). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.09 vs. PYVAX (10.28).
| PYVAX | RMEBX | PYVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.651 | 11.509 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.60 | 6.81 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.61 | 28.69 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.28 | 53.09 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.53 | 89.52 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement