Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMEBX
PYVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMEBX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$17.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
PYVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PYVAX (1.06B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMEBX (1.05) vs PYVAX (0.81). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than PYVAX (1.01). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMEBX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.78 vs. PYVAX (-7.00). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.31 vs. PYVAX (15.31).
| PYVAX | RMEBX | PYVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.312 | 14.628 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.05 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.00 | 7.78 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.44 | 37.96 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.31 | 62.31 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.02 | 95.56 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement