Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$16.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. PYVAX (1.03B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.26) vs PYVAX (0.85). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.08 vs. PYVAX (-3.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.27 vs. PYVAX (9.19).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.100 | 9.394 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 108B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.69 | 11.08 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.83 | 25.54 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.19 | 54.27 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.02 | 76.20 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement