Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$16.54
Change+$0.12 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.27
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PYVAX (1.01B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.31) vs PYVAX (1.00). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. PYVAX (-7.16). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.87 vs. PYVAX (15.52).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.909 | 7.403 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.31 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | 9.64 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.52 | 26.42 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.52 | 63.87 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.29 | 76.11 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement