Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$17.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.09
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PYVAX (1.06B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.20) vs PYVAX (0.81). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.91 vs. PYVAX (-7.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.49 vs. PYVAX (15.31).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.312 | 14.761 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.20 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.00 | 7.91 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.44 | 38.55 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.31 | 63.49 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.02 | 97.36 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement