Ad is loading...
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$14.81
Change-$0.31 (-2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets928.06M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.20
Change-$1.36 (-2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. PYVAX (928M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.34) vs PYVAX (1.02). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PYVAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. PYVAX (-12.66). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.06 vs. PYVAX (6.58).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.91 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.91 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.159 | -1.578 | 390% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 928M | 98.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.34 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.66 | 3.11 | -408% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.16 | 7.15 | -184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.58 | 55.06 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.12 | 56.78 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...