Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$17.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PYVAX (1.04B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.26) vs PYVAX (0.85). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. PYVAX (-6.60). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. PYVAX (10.28).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.651 | 11.642 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.60 | 6.98 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.61 | 29.24 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.28 | 54.21 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.53 | 91.22 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement