Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PYVAX vs RMFCX
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PYVAX vs RMFCX
Payden Equity Income Adviser
Price$16.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.41
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.92B
PYVAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PYVAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PYVAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PYVAX (1.02B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PYVAX: RMFCX (1.27) vs PYVAX (0.86). PYVAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PYVAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PYVAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). PYVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PYVAX: RMFCX (250) vs PYVAX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. PYVAX (-8.52). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.17 vs. PYVAX (11.20).
| PYVAX | RMFCX | PYVAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.726 | 9.578 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.27 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.52 | 8.23 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.19 | 31.78 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.20 | 57.17 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.50 | 76.07 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement