Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMEBX
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.07
Change-$0.36 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets600.89M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.24
Change-$0.49 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PZFVX (601M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PZFVX (2.48) vs RMEBX (1.09). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMEBX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. PZFVX (-25.94). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 61.00 vs. PZFVX (16.27).
| PZFVX | RMEBX | PZFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.029 | 12.407 | 65% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 1.09 | 228% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.94 | 5.89 | -440% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.36 | 39.94 | -48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.27 | 61.00 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.10 | 101.18 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement