Ad is loading...
PZFVX vs RMEBX
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets769.04M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.36
Change+$0.39 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.76B
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. PZFVX (769M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PZFVX: RMEBX (1.54) vs PZFVX (1.24). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). RMEBX (25.00) and PZFVX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMEBX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.64 vs. PZFVX (-25.21). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.04 vs. PZFVX (-14.98).
| PZFVX | RMEBX | PZFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.349 | 4.481 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 769M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.54 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.21 | 13.64 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.37 | 15.51 | -228% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.98 | 44.04 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.93 | 68.60 | 14% |