Ad is loading...
PZFVX vs RMEBX
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$23.59
Change+$0.33 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.69M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. PZFVX (588M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PZFVX (2.69) vs RMEBX (1.21). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMEBX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. PZFVX (-32.10). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. PZFVX (12.77).
| PZFVX | RMEBX | PZFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.189 | 1.203 | -99% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 588M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 1.21 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.10 | 5.19 | -618% |
| Returns for 3 years | -36.83 | 16.77 | -220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.77 | 55.02 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.33 | 58.89 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...