Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMEBX
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.35
Change+$0.26 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets582.5M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.95
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. PZFVX (583M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PZFVX (2.61) vs RMEBX (1.11). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMEBX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.69 vs. PZFVX (-28.77). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.83 vs. PZFVX (3.15).
| PZFVX | RMEBX | PZFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.336 | 9.788 | 24% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 583M | 108B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 1.11 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.77 | 9.69 | -297% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.71 | 25.45 | -128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.15 | 53.83 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.41 | 77.07 | 1% |