Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMEBX
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMEBX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$23.94
Change-$0.07 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets598.03M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
PZFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. PZFVX (598M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: PZFVX (2.63) vs RMEBX (1.16). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMEBX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. PZFVX (-29.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. PZFVX (-4.68).
| PZFVX | RMEBX | PZFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.997 | 5.349 | 37% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.16 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.27 | 8.30 | -352% |
| Returns for 3 years | -37.75 | 17.96 | -210% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.68 | 49.85 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.15 | 68.21 | -2% |