Ad is loading...
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.62
Change-$0.38 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets748.71M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.12
Change-$0.34 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.79B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. PZFVX (749M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PZFVX: RMFCX (1.69) vs PZFVX (1.24). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (25.00) and PZFVX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.16 vs. PZFVX (-27.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.04 vs. PZFVX (-5.83).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.202 | 4.635 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 749M | 106B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.11 | 10.16 | -267% |
| Returns for 3 years | -34.16 | 16.67 | -205% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.83 | 49.04 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.24 | 68.81 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers