Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.78
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets609.76M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.40
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.25B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. PZFVX (610M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.63) vs RMFCX (1.31). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. PZFVX (-25.66). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 64.23 vs. PZFVX (15.86).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.268 | 7.643 | 69% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.31 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.66 | 9.93 | -258% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.80 | 27.81 | -104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.86 | 64.23 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.75 | 76.26 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement