Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.00
Change-$0.14 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets544.5M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. PZFVX (544M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.53) vs RMFCX (1.21). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. PZFVX (-32.91). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. PZFVX (-12.25).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.549 | 12.783 | 20% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 544M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 1.21 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.91 | 6.00 | -549% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.91 | 27.94 | -121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.25 | 52.67 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.67 | 84.73 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers