Ad is loading...
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$23.59
Change+$0.33 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.69M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. PZFVX (588M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.69) vs RMFCX (1.37). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. PZFVX (-32.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. PZFVX (12.77).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.189 | 1.270 | -94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 588M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 1.37 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | -32.10 | 5.35 | -600% |
| Returns for 3 years | -36.83 | 17.29 | -213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.77 | 56.16 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.33 | 60.33 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...