Ad is loading...
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets769.04M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.05
Change+$0.39 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.76B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. PZFVX (769M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than PZFVX: RMFCX (1.69) vs PZFVX (1.24). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (25.00) and PZFVX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.79 vs. PZFVX (-25.21). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.08 vs. PZFVX (-14.98).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.349 | 4.506 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 769M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.69 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.21 | 13.79 | -183% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.37 | 16.01 | -221% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.98 | 45.08 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.93 | 70.14 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers