Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.35
Change+$0.26 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets582.5M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.62
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. PZFVX (583M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.61) vs RMFCX (1.26). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. PZFVX (-28.77). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.97 vs. PZFVX (3.15).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.336 | 9.891 | 24% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 583M | 108B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 1.26 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.77 | 9.82 | -293% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.71 | 25.99 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.15 | 54.97 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.41 | 78.66 | 1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers