Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets617.35M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PZFVX (617M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.61) vs RMFCX (1.26). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. PZFVX (-26.53). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. PZFVX (8.22).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.813 | 11.642 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 617M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 1.26 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.53 | 6.98 | -380% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.64 | 29.24 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.22 | 54.21 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.66 | 91.22 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement