Ad is loading...
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$21.79
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets572.05M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. PZFVX (572M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.61) vs RMFCX (1.34). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PZFVX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. PZFVX (-34.99). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. PZFVX (11.76).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.307 | -3.342 | 219% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 572M | 96.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 1.34 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | -34.99 | 3.60 | -973% |
| Returns for 3 years | -44.41 | 5.79 | -767% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.76 | 48.78 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.69 | 52.90 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...