Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFCX
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFCX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.88
Change-$0.32 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets589.32M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.34
Change-$0.41 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.64B
PZFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. PZFVX (589M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: PZFVX (2.52) vs RMFCX (1.20). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFCX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. PZFVX (-29.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.66 vs. PZFVX (7.20).
| PZFVX | RMFCX | PZFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.052 | 13.375 | 53% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 589M | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 1.20 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | -29.06 | 4.58 | -635% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.18 | 39.94 | -61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.20 | 56.66 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.23 | 90.65 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement