Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZISX vs SSGSX
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZISX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$12.51
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.05M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZISX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZISX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. PZISX (70M). PZISX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZISX (1.69) vs SSGSX (0.49). PZISX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZISX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZISX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZISX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZISX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZISX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.44 vs. PZISX (-19.18). PZISX return over 5 years is better than : 20.95 vs. SSGSX (2.06).
| PZISX | SSGSX | PZISX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.849 | -4.415 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70M | 4.98B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.49 | 348% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.18 | -14.44 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.29 | -10.47 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.95 | 2.06 | 1,015% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement