Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZISX vs SSGSX
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZISX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$13.80
Change+$0.07 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets57.8M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.83
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.4B
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZISX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZISX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.4B vs. PZISX (57.8M). PZISX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZISX (1.59) vs SSGSX (0.48). PZISX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZISX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZISX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZISX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZISX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZISX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.61 vs. PZISX (-6.29). PZISX return over 5 years is better than : 47.85 vs. SSGSX (18.40).
| PZISX | SSGSX | PZISX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.499 | 0.862 | -174% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 57.8M | 5.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.48 | 333% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | -4.61 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.40 | 0.76 | 847% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.85 | 18.40 | 260% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.14 | - |