Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZISX vs SSGSX
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZISX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$14.41
Change+$0.71 (+5.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.22
Change+$1.84 (+4.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.46B
PZISX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZISX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZISX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.46B vs. PZISX (44.2M). PZISX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZISX (1.72) vs SSGSX (0.50). PZISX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZISX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PZISX (1.39) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZISX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZISX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZISX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.89 vs. PZISX (-6.84). PZISX return over 5 years is better than : 60.13 vs. SSGSX (19.01).
| PZISX | SSGSX | PZISX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.213 | -2.261 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2M | 5.46B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 0.50 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.84 | -5.89 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.15 | -6.58 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.13 | 19.01 | 316% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers