Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZVSX vs SSGSX
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZVSX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Investor
Price$13.41
Change-$0.25 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.55M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.38
Change-$0.51 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.48B
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.48B vs. PZVSX (58.6M). PZVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZVSX (1.30) vs SSGSX (0.48). PZVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZVSX (9 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZVSX (1.74) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZVSX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVSX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZVSX (5000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.01 vs. PZVSX (-6.56). PZVSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.06 vs. SSGSX (20.41).
| PZVSX | SSGSX | PZVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.26 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.26 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.656 | 0.991 | -167% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.6M | 5.48B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.48 | 274% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.56 | -4.01 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.25 | 7.03 | 231% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.06 | 20.41 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement