Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZVSX vs SSGSX
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZVSX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Investor
Price$14.20
Change-$0.15 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.41M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZVSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. PZVSX (46.4M). PZVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZVSX (1.41) vs SSGSX (0.50). PZVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZVSX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). PZVSX (1.74) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZVSX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVSX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZVSX (5000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.93 vs. PZVSX (-4.36). PZVSX return over 5 years is better than : 61.82 vs. SSGSX (20.68).
| PZVSX | SSGSX | PZVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.26 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.26 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.312 | 1.852 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4M | 5.63B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.50 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.36 | -3.93 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.62 | -0.85 | -1,135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.82 | 20.68 | 299% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement