Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZVSX vs SSGSX
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts PZVSX vs SSGSX
Pzena Small Cap Value Investor
Price$12.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.15M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
PZVSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZVSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZVSX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. PZVSX (70.2M). PZVSX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: PZVSX (1.39) vs SSGSX (0.49). PZVSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: PZVSX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). PZVSX (1.74) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. PZVSX (30.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZVSX: SSGSX (2500) vs PZVSX (5000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.94 vs. PZVSX (-18.84). PZVSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.35 vs. SSGSX (2.50).
| PZVSX | SSGSX | PZVSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.26 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.26 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.943 | -4.243 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.2M | 4.96B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.49 | 286% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.84 | -13.94 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.88 | -10.31 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.35 | 2.50 | 813% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement