Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBCX
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$22.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets277.64M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.56
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.3B
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 251B vs. QABGX (278M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBCX (1.57) vs QABGX (1.25). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBCX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. QABGX (1.77). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.78 vs. QABGX (22.75).
| QABGX | RLBCX | QABGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.89 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.975 | 7.681 | 91% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 251B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.57 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | 5.28 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 34.09 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.75 | 36.78 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.92 | 59.00 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement