Ad is loading...
QABGX vs RLBCX
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$20.60
Change+$1.11 (+5.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.17M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$33.25
Change+$1.61 (+5.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.49B
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 217B vs. QABGX (235M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBCX (1.69) vs QABGX (1.33). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QABGX (68.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBCX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.89 vs. QABGX (-8.03). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.45 vs. QABGX (20.44).
| QABGX | RLBCX | QABGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.89 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.153 | -7.023 | 116% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 217B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.69 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.03 | -3.89 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.71 | 4.21 | -64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.44 | 28.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.41 | 37.45 | 68% |