Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBCX
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.38M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.85
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QABGX (297M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBCX (1.49) vs QABGX (1.20). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBCX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. QABGX (3.33). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.65 vs. QABGX (23.20).
| QABGX | RLBCX | QABGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.89 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.593 | 14.659 | 79% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.49 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.33 | 9.58 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.70 | 50.48 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.20 | 40.65 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.50 | 74.05 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement