Ad is loading...
QABGX vs RLBCX
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$21.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.21M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.11
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.12B
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. QABGX (260M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBCX (1.70) vs QABGX (1.33). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBCX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.86 vs. QABGX (0.43). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.81 vs. QABGX (27.11).
| QABGX | RLBCX | QABGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.89 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.895 | 0.235 | 381% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.70 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.43 | 3.86 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.28 | 20.64 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.11 | 34.81 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.90 | 48.19 | 81% |