Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBCX
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$22.55
Change+$0.16 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets272.39M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.18
Change+$0.26 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.64B
QABGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. QABGX (272M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBCX (1.63) vs QABGX (1.28). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBCX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. QABGX (2.93). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.82 vs. QABGX (26.79).
| QABGX | RLBCX | QABGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.89 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.89 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.514 | 6.562 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272M | 248B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.63 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 7.01 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.60 | 31.59 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.79 | 40.82 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.27 | 60.76 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement