Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBEX
QABGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.61M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.45
Change-$0.11 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
QABGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. QABGX (294M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBEX (1.79) vs QABGX (1.22). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBEX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. QABGX (4.19). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.83 vs. QABGX (26.49).
| QABGX | RLBEX | QABGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.59 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.59 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.546 | 12.878 | 90% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.19 | 9.28 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.72 | 42.83 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.49 | 42.83 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | 81.02 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement