Ad is loading...
QABGX vs RLBEX
QABGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$20.60
Change+$1.11 (+5.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.17M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$33.41
Change+$1.62 (+5.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.49B
QABGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 217B vs. QABGX (235M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBEX (1.97) vs QABGX (1.33). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QABGX (68.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBEX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.59 vs. QABGX (-8.03). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 30.13 vs. QABGX (20.44).
| QABGX | RLBEX | QABGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.60 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.60 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.153 | -6.951 | 117% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 217B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.97 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.03 | -3.59 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.71 | 4.98 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.44 | 30.13 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.41 | 41.70 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...