QBCAF
Price
$31.95
Change
+$4.80 (+17.68%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
7.05B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SGAPY
Price
$32.44
Change
-$0.04 (-0.12%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
53.66B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBCAF vs SGAPY

Header iconQBCAF vs SGAPY Comparison
Open Charts QBCAF vs SGAPYBanner chart's image
Quebecor
Price$31.95
Change+$4.80 (+17.68%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.05B
Singapore Telecommunications
Price$32.44
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
Volume$67.15K
Capitalization53.66B
QBCAF vs SGAPY Comparison Chart in %
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBCAF vs. SGAPY commentary
Oct 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCAF is a Hold and SGAPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 20, 2025
Stock price -- (QBCAF: $31.95 vs. SGAPY: $32.44)
Brand notoriety: QBCAF and SGAPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBCAF: 100% vs. SGAPY: 75%
Market capitalization -- QBCAF: $7.05B vs. SGAPY: $53.66B
QBCAF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $7.05B. SGAPY’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $53.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $258.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBCAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSGAPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QBCAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SGAPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCAF is a better buy in the long-term than SGAPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBCAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGAPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBCAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SGAPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGAPY is a better buy in the short-term than QBCAF.

Price Growth

QBCAF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SGAPY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGAPY is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGAPY($53.7B) has a higher market cap than QBCAF($7.05B). SGAPY has higher P/E ratio than QBCAF: SGAPY (17.57) vs QBCAF (13.44). SGAPY YTD gains are higher at: 51.701 vs. QBCAF (29.346). SGAPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.45B vs. QBCAF (2.3B). SGAPY has higher revenues than QBCAF: SGAPY (14.1B) vs QBCAF (5.61B).
QBCAFSGAPYQBCAF / SGAPY
Capitalization7.05B53.7B13%
EBITDA2.3B7.45B31%
Gain YTD29.34651.70157%
P/E Ratio13.4417.5776%
Revenue5.61B14.1B40%
Total Cash21MN/A-
Total Debt7.48BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBCAF vs SGAPY: Fundamental Ratings
QBCAF
SGAPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
542
SMR RATING
1..100
2896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGAPY's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCAF (82). This means that SGAPY’s stock grew similarly to QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

SGAPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCAF (54). This means that SGAPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCAF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGAPY (96). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SGAPY (48). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

QBCAF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGAPY (100). This means that QBCAF’s stock grew significantly faster than SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBCAFSGAPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QBCAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NATH109.352.16
+2.02%
Nathan's Famous
COKE131.681.09
+0.83%
Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc
SGA12.34-0.15
-1.21%
Saga Communications
AVAH9.86-0.13
-1.30%
Aveanna Healthcare Holdings
WOK0.04-0.02
-31.91%
WORK Medical Technology Group Ltd

QBCAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QBCAF and SFBQF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBCAF and SFBQF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCAF
1D Price
Change %
QBCAF100%
N/A
SFBQF - QBCAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
PCWLF - QBCAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
SFTBY - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
NPPXF - QBCAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
SGAPY - QBCAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More

SGAPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGAPY has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGAPY jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGAPY
1D Price
Change %
SGAPY100%
-0.12%
SKM - SGAPY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
RCI - SGAPY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
KT - SGAPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
TLGPY - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
CHT - SGAPY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More