QBCRF
Price
$21.01
Change
-$0.54 (-2.51%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.65B
SFBQF
Price
$1.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
53.12B
Ad is loading...

QBCRF vs SFBQF

Header iconQBCRF vs SFBQF Comparison
Open Charts QBCRF vs SFBQFBanner chart's image
Quebecor
Price$21.01
Change-$0.54 (-2.51%)
Volume$36.95K
Capitalization5.65B
Softbank Group
Price$1.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization53.12B
QBCRF vs SFBQF Comparison Chart
Loading...
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBCRF vs. SFBQF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a Hold and SFBQF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (QBCRF: $21.01 vs. SFBQF: $1.25)
Brand notoriety: QBCRF and SFBQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBCRF: 3% vs. SFBQF: 3%
Market capitalization -- QBCRF: $5.65B vs. SFBQF: $53.12B
QBCRF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $5.65B. SFBQF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $53.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBQF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QBCRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFBQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the long-term than SFBQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBQF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBCRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SFBQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the short-term than SFBQF.

Price Growth

QBCRF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while SFBQF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +10.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+10.76% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBQF($53.1B) has a higher market cap than QBCRF($5.65B). SFBQF has higher P/E ratio than QBCRF: SFBQF (14.35) vs QBCRF (12.85). SFBQF YTD gains are higher at: -0.943 vs. QBCRF (-4.778). SFBQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.74T vs. QBCRF (1.88B). SFBQF has more cash in the bank: 2.25T vs. QBCRF (5.9M). QBCRF has less debt than SFBQF: QBCRF (6.36B) vs SFBQF (6.14T). SFBQF has higher revenues than QBCRF: SFBQF (5.91T) vs QBCRF (4.56B).
QBCRFSFBQFQBCRF / SFBQF
Capitalization5.65B53.1B11%
EBITDA1.88B1.74T0%
Gain YTD-4.778-0.943507%
P/E Ratio12.8514.3590%
Revenue4.56B5.91T0%
Total Cash5.9M2.25T0%
Total Debt6.36B6.14T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBCRF: Fundamental Ratings
QBCRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBCRFSFBQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFBQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NZUS32.240.25
+0.78%
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
VFQY144.710.51
+0.36%
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF
APRJ24.710.04
+0.16%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Apr
STXT19.78N/A
+0.01%
Strive Total Return Bond ETF
FSEC42.47-0.03
-0.07%
Fidelity Investment Grade Sec ETF

QBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBCRF has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBCRF jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCRF
1D Price
Change %
QBCRF100%
-2.52%
BCE - QBCRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
RCI - QBCRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
DTEGY - QBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
TU - QBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
VZ - QBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
More

SFBQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFBQF and QBCAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFBQF and QBCAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBQF
1D Price
Change %
SFBQF100%
N/A
QBCAF - SFBQF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QBCRF - SFBQF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
PTXKY - SFBQF
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.12%
SGAPY - SFBQF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
SNGNF - SFBQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.99%
More