QBCRF
Price
$21.93
Change
+$0.15 (+0.69%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SMNUF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

QBCRF vs SMNUF

Header iconQBCRF vs SMNUF Comparison
Open Charts QBCRF vs SMNUFBanner chart's image
Quebecor
Price$21.93
Change+$0.15 (+0.69%)
Volume$200.28K
CapitalizationN/A
Pt Sarana Menara Nusantara, Tbk
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
QBCRF vs SMNUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBCRF vs. SMNUF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a StrongSell and SMNUF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (QBCRF: $21.93 vs. SMNUF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: QBCRF and SMNUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBCRF: 14% vs. SMNUF: 8%
Market capitalization -- QBCRF: $5.65B vs. SMNUF: $3.36B
QBCRF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $5.65B. SMNUF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMNUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QBCRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMNUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMNUF is a better buy in the long-term than QBCRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMNUF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBCRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMNUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMNUF is a better buy in the short-term than QBCRF.

Price Growth

QBCRF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -4.74% price change this week, while SMNUF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +18.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (-1.17% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QBCRF($5.65B) has a higher market cap than SMNUF($3.36B). SMNUF has higher P/E ratio than QBCRF: SMNUF (13.53) vs QBCRF (12.85). QBCRF YTD gains are higher at: -3.562 vs. SMNUF (-37.046). SMNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.4T vs. QBCRF (1.88B). SMNUF has more cash in the bank: 855B vs. QBCRF (5.9M). QBCRF has less debt than SMNUF: QBCRF (6.36B) vs SMNUF (45.22T). SMNUF has higher revenues than QBCRF: SMNUF (11.28T) vs QBCRF (4.56B).
QBCRFSMNUFQBCRF / SMNUF
Capitalization5.65B3.36B168%
EBITDA1.88B6.4T0%
Gain YTD-3.562-37.04610%
P/E Ratio12.8513.5395%
Revenue4.56B11.28T0%
Total Cash5.9M855B0%
Total Debt6.36B45.22T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBCRF vs SMNUF: Fundamental Ratings
QBCRF
SMNUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5099
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
2514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QBCRF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (43). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (100). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCRF (25). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as QBCRF (59). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNUF (84). This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBCRFSMNUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UIAGX71.01N/A
N/A
Victory Aggressive Growth Institutional
QQMNX20.54-0.06
-0.29%
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral IS
MQGIX47.59-0.97
-2.00%
MFS International Growth I
FSBCX19.56-0.42
-2.10%
Federated Hermes Global Allocation C
NVSOX13.16-0.60
-4.36%
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap Adm

QBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBCRF has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBCRF jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCRF
1D Price
Change %
QBCRF100%
+0.69%
BCE - QBCRF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
RCI - QBCRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
DTEGY - QBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
TU - QBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
VZ - QBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More

SMNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNUF has been loosely correlated with TCMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNUF jumps, then TCMFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMNUF
1D Price
Change %
SMNUF100%
N/A
TCMFF - SMNUF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TELDF - SMNUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VZ - SMNUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
QBCRF - SMNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
SRHBY - SMNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More