Advertisement
QBCRF vs TU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a Hold and TU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QBCRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TU’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBCRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
QBCRF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while TU (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +2.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
TU is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| QBCRF | TU | QBCRF / TU | |
| Capitalization | 5.65B | 23.5B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 1.88B | 6.45B | 29% |
| Gain YTD | 37.217 | 20.206 | 184% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.85 | 37.02 | 35% |
| Revenue | 4.56B | 20B | 23% |
| Total Cash | 5.9M | 864M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 6.36B | 27.5B | 23% |
QBCRF | TU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TU's Valuation (11) in the Major Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for QBCRF (77) in the null industry. This means that TU’s stock grew significantly faster than QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (100) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (77) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TU (51) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to TU’s over the last 12 months.
QBCRF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (86) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.
| QBCRF | TU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 38% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 32% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SVOL | 19.27 | 0.90 | +4.90% |
| Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | |||
| GBPAUD | 2.08 | 0.00 | +0.20% |
| United Kingdom Pound - Australian Dollar | |||
| AUDNZD | 1.08 | 0.00 | +0.08% |
| Australian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar | |||
| CNYAUD | 0.21 | N/A | N/A |
| China Yuan - Australian Dollar | |||
| NZDAUD | 0.92 | -0.00 | -0.10% |
| New Zealand Dollar - Australian Dollar | |||
QBCRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBCRF has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBCRF jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBCRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBCRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BCE - QBCRF | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| RCI - QBCRF | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| DTEGY - QBCRF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| TU - QBCRF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| VZ - QBCRF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||
TU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TU has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TU jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TU | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| BCE - TU | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| DTEGY - TU | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| RCI - TU | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| TLSNY - TU | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.84% | ||
| TELNY - TU | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||