QBCRF
Price
$28.94
Change
-$0.12 (-0.41%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.75B
TU
Price
$16.38
Change
+$0.12 (+0.74%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
25.11B
76 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBCRF vs TU

Header iconQBCRF vs TU Comparison
Open Charts QBCRF vs TUBanner chart's image
Quebecor
Price$28.94
Change-$0.12 (-0.41%)
Volume$20.1K
Capitalization6.75B
Telus
Price$16.38
Change+$0.12 (+0.74%)
Volume$2.5M
Capitalization25.11B
QBCRF vs TU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QBCRF vs. TU commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBCRF is a StrongBuy and TU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (QBCRF: $28.94 vs. TU: $16.38)
Brand notoriety: QBCRF and TU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QBCRF: 4% vs. TU: 79%
Market capitalization -- QBCRF: $6.75B vs. TU: $25.11B
QBCRF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $6.75B. TU’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $25.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QBCRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QBCRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QBCRF is a better buy in the long-term than TU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QBCRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TU’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QBCRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TU’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TU is a better buy in the short-term than QBCRF.

Price Growth

QBCRF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +5.24% price change this week, while TU (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

TU is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TU($25.1B) has a higher market cap than QBCRF($6.75B). TU has higher P/E ratio than QBCRF: TU (34.66) vs QBCRF (11.92). QBCRF YTD gains are higher at: 31.188 vs. TU (20.796). TU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.37B vs. QBCRF (2.33B). TU has more cash in the bank: 3.68B vs. QBCRF (214M). QBCRF has less debt than TU: QBCRF (7.97B) vs TU (33.1B). TU has higher revenues than QBCRF: TU (20.4B) vs QBCRF (5.62B).
QBCRFTUQBCRF / TU
Capitalization6.75B25.1B27%
EBITDA2.33B6.37B36%
Gain YTD31.18820.796150%
P/E Ratio11.9234.6634%
Revenue5.62B20.4B28%
Total Cash214M3.68B6%
Total Debt7.97B33.1B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QBCRF vs TU: Fundamental Ratings
QBCRF
TU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3510
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
2579
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3573
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TU's Valuation (12) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QBCRF (63) in the null industry. This means that TU’s stock grew somewhat faster than QBCRF’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (100) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (79) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as TU (55) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew similarly to TU’s over the last 12 months.

QBCRF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TU (73) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that QBCRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBCRFTU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHDG32.340.01
+0.03%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Qt Dyn Buffr ETF
QLVE28.08N/A
N/A
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
EIPX25.73-0.11
-0.41%
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
XJR41.33-0.27
-0.64%
iShares ESG Select Scrn S&P Small-CapETF
RDVI25.17-0.26
-1.02%
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF

QBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBCRF has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QBCRF jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QBCRF
1D Price
Change %
QBCRF100%
N/A
BCE - QBCRF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
RCI - QBCRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
DTEGY - QBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
TU - QBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
VZ - QBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More

TU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TU has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TU jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TU
1D Price
Change %
TU100%
+0.74%
BCE - TU
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
DTEGY - TU
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
TEF - TU
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
RCI - TU
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
VZ - TU
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
More