Advertisement
QBEIF vs QBIEY
To understand the difference between QBE Insurance Group (QBEIF) vs. QBE Insurance Group - ADR (QBIEY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBEIF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQBIEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- QBEIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- QBIEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBEIF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBIEY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBEIF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
- QBIEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
QBEIF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QBIEY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -8.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.45%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.11% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| QBEIF | QBIEY | QBEIF / QBIEY | |
| Capitalization | 19.2B | 19.2B | 100% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.881 | 12.906 | 131% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.33 | 9.64 | 107% |
| Revenue | 19.2B | 19.2B | 100% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.9B | 2.9B | 100% |
QBEIF | QBIEY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QBIEY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as QBEIF (25). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to QBEIF’s over the last 12 months.
QBEIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (14). This means that QBEIF’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
QBEIF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (95). This means that QBEIF’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
QBIEY's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as QBEIF (56). This means that QBIEY’s stock grew similarly to QBEIF’s over the last 12 months.
QBEIF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as QBIEY (51). This means that QBEIF’s stock grew similarly to QBIEY’s over the last 12 months.
| QBEIF | QBIEY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 27% | 1 day ago 49% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CONL | 36.22 | 1.17 | +3.34% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | |||
| FNK | 54.06 | 0.31 | +0.58% |
| First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| CGDV | 41.77 | 0.09 | +0.22% |
| Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | |||
| EUO | 28.39 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| ProShares UltraShort Euro | |||
| IDVZ | 30.69 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Opal International Div Inc ETF | |||
QBEIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QBEIF and PPCCY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBEIF and PPCCY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBEIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBEIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PPCCY - QBEIF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
| SMPNY - QBEIF | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.67% | ||
| QUCOF - QBEIF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PZAKY - QBEIF | -0% Poorly correlated | +3.54% | ||
| QBIEY - QBEIF | -4% Poorly correlated | -8.05% |
QBIEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QBIEY and BNT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QBIEY and BNT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBIEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBIEY | 100% | -8.05% | ||
| BNT - QBIEY | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.14% | ||
| SMPNY - QBIEY | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.67% | ||
| TKOMY - QBIEY | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
| STC - QBIEY | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
| DGICB - QBIEY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||