Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWEBX
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$45.71
Change-$0.22 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.74B
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. QCACX (2.73B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWEBX (0.76) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWEBX (250) vs QCACX (1500). QCACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. RWEBX (6.21). QCACX return over 5 years is better than : 50.74 vs. RWEBX (48.18).
| QCACX | RWEBX | QCACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.06 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.06 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.426 | 10.050 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.29 | 6.21 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.41 | 42.84 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.74 | 48.18 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.99 | 76.27 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement