Ad is loading...
QCACX vs RWEBX
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$40.83
Change-$0.86 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$63.69
Change-$0.87 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.11B
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. QCACX (1.58B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWEBX (1.07) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QCACX (19 years) vs RWEBX (10 years). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 130.00 vs. RWEBX (30.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWEBX (250) vs QCACX (1500). QCACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.83 vs. RWEBX (7.35). QCACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.07 vs. RWEBX (35.06).
| QCACX | RWEBX | QCACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.498 | 4.137 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 196B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.83 | 7.35 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.02 | 16.22 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.07 | 35.06 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.30 | 56.92 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...