Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWEBX
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$44.65
Change-$0.13 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.96
Change-$0.14 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.49B
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. QCACX (2.44B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWEBX (0.79) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWEBX (250) vs QCACX (1500). QCACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.50 vs. RWEBX (5.78). QCACX (47.60) and RWEBX (45.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QCACX | RWEBX | QCACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.06 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.06 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.181 | 6.649 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 203B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.79 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.50 | 5.78 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.46 | 21.78 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.60 | 45.78 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.93 | 65.35 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement