Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWEBX
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$45.75
Change+$0.21 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.52
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.31B
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. QCACX (2.61B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWEBX (0.78) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWEBX (250) vs QCACX (1500). QCACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. RWEBX (6.57). QCACX return over 5 years is better than : 53.18 vs. RWEBX (48.83).
| QCACX | RWEBX | QCACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.06 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.06 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.437 | 9.145 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.78 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 6.57 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.06 | 34.86 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.18 | 48.83 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.03 | 82.15 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement