Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs RWEBX
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$44.82
Change+$0.55 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.79B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.71
Change+$0.63 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.17B
QCACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. QCACX (2.79B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QCACX: RWEBX (0.76) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QCACX (20 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). QCACX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCACX: RWEBX (250) vs QCACX (1500). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.72 vs. QCACX (1.56). RWEBX (40.69) and QCACX (40.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QCACX | RWEBX | QCACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.06 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.06 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.612 | 8.076 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.79B | 202B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.56 | 2.72 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.75 | 25.48 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.28 | 40.69 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.81 | 66.54 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement