Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCACX vs VFFSX
QCACX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts QCACX vs VFFSX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core C
Price$44.65
Change-$0.13 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$315.98
Change-$0.85 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33T
QCACX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCACX vs. VFFSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCACX is a StrongBuy and VFFSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.33T vs. QCACX (2.44B). VFFSX pays higher dividends than QCACX: VFFSX (1.20) vs QCACX (0.00). QCACX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: QCACX (20 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). QCACX (1.94) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). QCACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. VFFSX (2.00). QCACX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: QCACX (1500) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.43 vs. QCACX (12.50). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 91.44 vs. QCACX (47.60).
| QCACX | VFFSX | QCACX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.01 | 18,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.01 | 19,400% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.181 | 9.835 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 1.33T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.50 | 16.43 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.46 | 49.97 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.60 | 91.44 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement