Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBEX
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.54
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.94M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.47
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.44B
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. QCBGX (287M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBEX (1.81) vs QCBGX (0.62). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBEX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. QCBGX (4.45). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.32 vs. QCBGX (16.97).
| QCBGX | RLBEX | QCBGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.59 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.59 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.223 | 10.001 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 9.19 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.85 | 29.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.97 | 38.32 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.63 | 68.46 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement