Ad is loading...
QCBGX vs RLBEX
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$20.57
Change-$0.33 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.65M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.03
Change-$0.57 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.28B
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 237B vs. QCBGX (257M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBEX (1.91) vs QCBGX (0.65). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QCBGX (19 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QCBGX (68.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBEX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. QCBGX (0.86). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. QCBGX (20.14).
| QCBGX | RLBEX | QCBGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.60 | 353% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.60 | 353% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.917 | 0.963 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 237B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.91 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.86 | 5.13 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.19 | 17.25 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.14 | 34.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.38 | 55.24 | 59% |