Ad is loading...
QCBGX vs RLBEX
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$20.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.79M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.31
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. QCBGX (260M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBEX (1.98) vs QCBGX (0.67). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBEX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. QCBGX (-0.06). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.69 vs. QCBGX (21.42).
| QCBGX | RLBEX | QCBGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.59 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.59 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.483 | 0.425 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.98 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.06 | 4.73 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.43 | 21.84 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.42 | 36.69 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.28 | 52.56 | 56% |