Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBEX
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.96
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.62M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.86
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QCBGX (299M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBEX (1.74) vs QCBGX (0.61). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBEX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. QCBGX (3.13). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.38 vs. QCBGX (18.72).
| QCBGX | RLBEX | QCBGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.59 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.59 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.251 | 14.396 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.74 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | 9.95 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.45 | 51.09 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.72 | 42.38 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.31 | 78.78 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement