Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBEX
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$21.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.34M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$35.69
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.73B
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. QCBGX (268M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBEX (1.90) vs QCBGX (0.65). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBEX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. QCBGX (1.47). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.57 vs. QCBGX (16.56).
| QCBGX | RLBEX | QCBGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.59 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.59 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.008 | 4.581 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 244B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.90 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 6.95 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.82 | 22.98 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.56 | 34.57 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.36 | 61.12 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement