Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBEX
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBEX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.67
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.26M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.63
Change-$0.16 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.89B
QCBGX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 264B vs. QCBGX (303M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBEX (1.71) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBEX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. QCBGX (-0.65). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.00 vs. QCBGX (12.52).
| QCBGX | RLBEX | QCBGX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.59 | 358% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.59 | 358% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.464 | 13.718 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 264B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.71 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | 8.82 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 40.62 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.52 | 38.00 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.00 | 72.83 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement