Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCELX vs RWMFX
QCELX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QCELX vs RWMFX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style I
Price$22.07
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.01
Change-$0.24 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.56B
QCELX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCELX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCELX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. QCELX (1.27B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QCELX: RWMFX (1.43) vs QCELX (1.04). QCELX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QCELX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QCELX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCELX: RWMFX (250) vs QCELX (5000000). QCELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. RWMFX (8.25). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.22 vs. QCELX (34.34).
| QCELX | RWMFX | QCELX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.31 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.31 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.148 | 9.752 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.43 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 8.25 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.94 | 36.23 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.34 | 55.22 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.60 | 85.61 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement