Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCELX vs RWMFX
QCELX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QCELX vs RWMFX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style I
Price$22.33
Change-$0.08 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.35
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
QCELX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCELX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCELX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. QCELX (1.27B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QCELX: RWMFX (1.42) vs QCELX (1.01). QCELX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QCELX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QCELX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QCELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCELX: RWMFX (250) vs QCELX (5000000). QCELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.93 vs. RWMFX (7.06). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.63 vs. QCELX (29.42).
| QCELX | RWMFX | QCELX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.31 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.31 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.540 | 10.714 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.42 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.93 | 7.06 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.71 | 45.97 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.42 | 52.63 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | 82.50 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement