Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGABX
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.65
Change+$0.23 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.07B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.45
Change+$0.58 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGABX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. QCLGX (4.07B). QCLGX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGABX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGABX (24 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGABX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. RGABX (3.55). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 24.92 vs. QCLGX (21.22).
| QCLGX | RGABX | QCLGX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.39 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.39 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.582 | 13.595 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.07B | 325B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 3.55 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.04 | 54.67 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.22 | 24.92 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.56 | 71.71 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement