Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGABX
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$76.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. QCLGX (3.69B). QCLGX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGABX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGABX (23 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGABX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.65 vs. RGABX (16.53). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.12 vs. QCLGX (23.94).
| QCLGX | RGABX | QCLGX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.39 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.39 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.582 | 15.161 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.65 | 16.53 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.09 | 54.24 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.94 | 34.12 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.13 | 83.61 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers