Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGABX
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.96
Change+$0.34 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$79.16
Change+$0.59 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
QCLGX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGABX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. QCLGX (3.96B). QCLGX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGABX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGABX (23 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGABX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. RGABX (12.92). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 34.19 vs. QCLGX (26.30).
| QCLGX | RGABX | QCLGX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.39 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.39 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.496 | 19.181 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.01 | 12.92 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.41 | 69.62 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.30 | 34.19 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.24 | 88.66 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement