Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGAEX
QCLGX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGAEX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4
Price$85.10
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
QCLGX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGAEX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Buy and RGAEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. QCLGX (3.69B). RGAEX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: RGAEX (0.31) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGAEX (23 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.64). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAEX (25.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGAEX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.65 vs. RGAEX (18.38). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.18 vs. QCLGX (23.94).
| QCLGX | RGAEX | QCLGX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.64 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.64 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.582 | 15.751 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.65 | 18.38 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.09 | 60.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.94 | 42.18 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.13 | 99.47 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement