Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGAFX
QCLGX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGAFX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$28.96
Change+$0.34 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$89.40
Change+$0.66 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
QCLGX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGAFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. QCLGX (3.96B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: RGAFX (0.53) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGAFX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. RGAFX (15.14). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.91 vs. QCLGX (26.30).
| QCLGX | RGAFX | QCLGX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.34 | 515% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.34 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.496 | 20.129 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.01 | 15.14 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.41 | 77.28 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.30 | 43.91 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.24 | 108.02 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement