Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGAFX
QCLGX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGAFX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$86.32
Change+$0.21 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
QCLGX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. QCLGX (3.69B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: RGAFX (0.55) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGAFX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX (19.65) and RGAFX (18.84) have marching annual gain over last year. RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. QCLGX (23.94).
| QCLGX | RGAFX | QCLGX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.34 | 515% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.34 | 553% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.582 | 15.990 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.55 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.65 | 18.84 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.09 | 61.27 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.94 | 43.89 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.13 | 102.47 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement