Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGAGX
QCLGX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGAGX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
QCLGX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. QCLGX (3.69B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than QCLGX: RGAGX (0.59) vs QCLGX (0.00). QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: QCLGX (20 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). QCLGX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGAGX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX (19.65) and RGAGX (18.90) have marching annual gain over last year. RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. QCLGX (23.94).
| QCLGX | RGAGX | QCLGX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.30 | 583% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.30 | 627% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.582 | 16.016 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.65 | 18.90 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.09 | 61.40 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.94 | 44.13 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.13 | 102.81 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement