QCLN vs SEDG ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLN is a Hold and SEDG is a Hold.
SEDG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QCLN | SEDG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VAESX | 14.92 | -0.03 | -0.20% |
| Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap A | |||
| AFJAX | 18.48 | -0.25 | -1.33% |
| Virtus NFJ International Value A | |||
| HLSCX | 20.38 | -0.29 | -1.40% |
| Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IC | |||
| FIMVX | 25.78 | -0.43 | -1.64% |
| Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index | |||
| FMGKX | 13.73 | -0.24 | -1.72% |
| Fidelity Magellan K | |||
QCLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLN | 100% | -2.71% | ||
| RUN - QCLN | 78% Closely correlated | -4.01% | ||
| SEDG - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| ENPH - QCLN | 71% Closely correlated | -4.47% | ||
| NOVA - QCLN | 71% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| FCEL - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
SEDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEDG has been closely correlated with ENPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEDG jumps, then ENPH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEDG | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| ENPH - SEDG | 76% Closely correlated | -4.47% | ||
| RUN - SEDG | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.01% | ||
| SPWR - SEDG | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.63% | ||
| NOVA - SEDG | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| CSIQ - SEDG | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||