Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLN vs TAN
QCLN vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts QCLN vs TAN
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF
Price$31.30
Change+$0.55 (+1.79%)
Volume$65.39K
Net Assets385.75M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$33.59
Change+$0.26 (+0.78%)
Volume$494.44K
Net Assets605.29M
QCLN vs TAN Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLN vs. TAN commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLN is a Hold and TAN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 605M vs. QCLN (386M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than QCLN: TAN (1.419) vs QCLN (-7.690). QCLN was incepted earlier than TAN: QCLN (18 years) vs TAN (17 years). QCLN (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). TAN has a higher turnover QCLN (29.00) vs QCLN (29.00).
| QCLN | TAN | QCLN / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | -7.690 | 1.419 | -542% |
| Net Assets | 386M | 605M | 64% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.71 | 83% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 43.00 | 67% |
| Yield | 1.04 | 0.51 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QCLN | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QCLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLN has been closely correlated with ON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCLN jumps, then ON could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLN | 100% | +1.79% | ||
| ON - QCLN | 74% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| AEIS - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| BLDP - QCLN | 72% Closely correlated | +7.75% | ||
| POWI - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| ALB - QCLN | 70% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 79% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 76% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 72% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 71% Closely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 69% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||