Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QDIV vs SPLV
QDIV vs SPLV Comparison
Open Charts QDIV vs SPLV
Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF
Price$35.15
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.71K
Net Assets32.34M
Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF
Price$73.37
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Volume$2.98M
Net Assets7.88B
QDIV vs SPLV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QDIV vs. SPLV commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QDIV is a Buy and SPLV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPLV has more net assets: 7.88B vs. QDIV (32.3M). SPLV has a higher annual dividend yield than QDIV: SPLV (6.156) vs QDIV (3.488). QDIV was incepted earlier than SPLV: QDIV (7 years) vs SPLV (14 years). QDIV (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than SPLV (0.25). QDIV has a higher turnover SPLV (68.00) vs SPLV (68.00).
| QDIV | SPLV | QDIV / SPLV | |
| Gain YTD | 3.488 | 6.156 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 32.3M | 7.88B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.25 | 80% |
| Turnover | 82.76 | 68.00 | 122% |
| Yield | 2.93 | 1.82 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QDIV | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 13 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDIV has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QDIV jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDIV | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| BAC - QDIV | 68% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| KMI - QDIV | 67% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| HBAN - QDIV | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| USB - QDIV | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| FITB - QDIV | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||
SPLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPLV has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPLV jumps, then L could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPLV | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| L - SPLV | 83% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ADP - SPLV | 79% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| AFL - SPLV | 78% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| ETR - SPLV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| LIN - SPLV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||