QETAU
Price
$10.84
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SVII
Price
$13.08
Change
+$0.61 (+4.89%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
129.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QETAU vs SVII

Header iconQETAU vs SVII Comparison
Open Charts QETAU vs SVIIBanner chart's image
Quetta Acquisition
Price$10.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$410
CapitalizationN/A
Spring Valley Acquisition
Price$13.08
Change+$0.61 (+4.89%)
Volume$241.3K
Capitalization129.23M
QETAU vs SVII Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SVII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QETAU vs. SVII commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QETAU is a StrongBuy and SVII is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (QETAU: $10.84 vs. SVII: $13.08)
Brand notoriety: QETAU and SVII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QETAU: 108% vs. SVII: 417%
Market capitalization -- QETAU: $0 vs. SVII: $129.23M
QETAU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. SVII’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $129.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QETAU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QETAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QETAU and SVII are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVII’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SVII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

QETAU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVII (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +6.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVII YTD gains are higher at: 16.163 vs. QETAU (1.784). SVII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -727.09K vs. QETAU (-1.67M). QETAU has more cash in the bank: 226K vs. SVII (158K). QETAU has less debt than SVII: QETAU (1.04M) vs SVII (1.5M). QETAU (0) and SVII (0) have equivalent revenues.
QETAUSVIIQETAU / SVII
CapitalizationN/A129M-
EBITDA-1.67M-727.09K230%
Gain YTD1.78416.16311%
P/E RatioN/A118.91-
Revenue00-
Total Cash226K158K143%
Total Debt1.04M1.5M69%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QETAUSVII
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SVII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCICU10.86N/A
N/A
Vine Hill Capital Investment Corp.
STEL30.32-0.08
-0.26%
Stellar Bancorp
OBT25.41-0.14
-0.55%
Orange County Bancorp Inc
TPCS5.16-0.04
-0.67%
TechPrecision Corp
MHK125.55-2.31
-1.81%
Mohawk Industries

QETAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QETAU and PORT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QETAU and PORT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QETAU
1D Price
Change %
QETAU100%
N/A
PORT - QETAU
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVII - QETAU
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.89%
ADCV - QETAU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QETA - QETAU
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IROH - QETAU
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
More

SVII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVII has been loosely correlated with CMCAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVII jumps, then CMCAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVII
1D Price
Change %
SVII100%
+4.89%
CMCAF - SVII
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSSAF - SVII
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISRL - SVII
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
SVIIU - SVII
31%
Poorly correlated
+10.02%
TVACU - SVII
28%
Poorly correlated
+8.21%
More