Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QIACX vs RWEBX
QIACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QIACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core IS
Price$52.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.55B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.42
Change+$0.38 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.04B
QIACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QIACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QIACX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. QIACX (2.55B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QIACX: RWEBX (0.78) vs QIACX (0.39). QIACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QIACX (23 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than QIACX (0.93). QIACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QIACX: RWEBX (250) vs QIACX (1000000). QIACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.74 vs. RWEBX (6.87). QIACX return over 5 years is better than : 64.76 vs. RWEBX (46.37).
| QIACX | RWEBX | QIACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.06 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.06 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.976 | 7.404 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.78 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.74 | 6.87 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.70 | 31.90 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.76 | 46.37 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.62 | 76.91 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement