Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QIBGX vs RLBAX
QIBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QIBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced IS
Price$23.96
Change+$0.21 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets300.06M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$39.12
Change+$0.37 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.63B
QIBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QIBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QIBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QIBGX (300M). QIBGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QIBGX (1.38) vs RLBAX (1.08). QIBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QIBGX (23 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than QIBGX (1.12). QIBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QIBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QIBGX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. QIBGX (0.59). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.53 vs. QIBGX (20.18).
| QIBGX | RLBAX | QIBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.31 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.31 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.541 | 15.422 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.08 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.59 | 8.85 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.68 | 38.72 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.18 | 35.53 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.67 | 66.36 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement