Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QIBGX vs RLBAX
QIBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QIBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced IS
Price$23.87
Change+$0.08 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.38M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.73
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
QIBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QIBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QIBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QIBGX (297M). QIBGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QIBGX (1.39) vs RLBAX (1.10). QIBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QIBGX (23 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than QIBGX (1.12). QIBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QIBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QIBGX (1000000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. QIBGX (3.60). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. QIBGX (24.84).
| QIBGX | RLBAX | QIBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.31 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.31 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.743 | 14.271 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.10 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | 9.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.76 | 48.64 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.84 | 38.13 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.00 | 69.46 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement