Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QILGX vs RGABX
QILGX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts QILGX vs RGABX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth IS
Price$42.53
Change-$0.07 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.83B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.03
Change-$0.37 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
QILGX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QILGX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QILGX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. QILGX (3.83B). QILGX pays higher dividends than RGABX: QILGX (0.01) vs RGABX (0.00). QILGX was incepted earlier than RGABX: QILGX (20 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than QILGX (0.89). QILGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than QILGX: RGABX (250) vs QILGX (1000000). QILGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.04 vs. RGABX (14.87). QILGX return over 5 years is better than : 62.76 vs. RGABX (39.89).
| QILGX | RGABX | QILGX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.39 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.541 | 17.480 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.83B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.04 | 14.87 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.32 | 56.56 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.76 | 39.89 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.06 | 87.35 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement