24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
QINT vs SLF
QINT vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts QINT vs SLF
American Century Quality Dvrs Intl ETF
Price$48.69
Change+$0.19 (+0.39%)
Volume$4.65K
Net Assets228.32M
Sun Life Financial
Price$58.91
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
Volume$359.35K
Capitalization31.65B
QINT vs SLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QINT vs. SLF commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QINT is a Hold and SLF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLF: Fundamental Ratings
SLF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QINT | SLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 12 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 72% | 12 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 79% | 25 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 74% | 12 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QINT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QINT has been closely correlated with SLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QINT jumps, then SLF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QINT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QINT | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| SLF - QINT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| BN - QINT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| BMO - QINT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| STM - QINT | 67% Closely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| BAM - QINT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||
SLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLF | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| HIG - SLF | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| AVVIY - SLF | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| AXAHY - SLF | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| ALIZY - SLF | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| EQH - SLF | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||