Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QISGX vs WCMLX
QISGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts QISGX vs WCMLX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth IS
Price$31.39
Change-$0.25 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets521.6M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.52
Change-$0.17 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
QISGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QISGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QISGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QISGX has more cash in the bank: 522M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). QISGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . QISGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: QISGX (20 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than QISGX (1.12). QISGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than QISGX: WCMLX (100000) vs QISGX (1000000). QISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.24 vs. WCMLX (4.66). QISGX return over 5 years is better than : 22.00 vs. WCMLX (17.81).
| QISGX | WCMLX | QISGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.99 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.558 | 6.454 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 522M | 44.8M | 1,165% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.24 | 4.66 | 348% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | 25.02 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.00 | 17.81 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.59 | N/A | - |