Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKACX vs RWEBX
QKACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$51.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.55B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.42
Change+$0.38 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.04B
QKACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. QKACX (2.55B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than QKACX: RWEBX (0.78) vs QKACX (0.40). QKACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: QKACX (19 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than QKACX (0.86). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: QKACX (0) vs RWEBX (250). QKACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.50 vs. RWEBX (6.87). QKACX return over 5 years is better than : 63.43 vs. RWEBX (46.37).
| QKACX | RWEBX | QKACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.06 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.06 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.002 | 7.404 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 0.78 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.50 | 6.87 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.01 | 31.90 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.43 | 46.37 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.68 | 76.91 | 209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement