Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKACX vs RWMFX
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$51.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.55B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.04B
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. QKACX (2.55B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QKACX: RWMFX (1.43) vs QKACX (0.40). QKACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QKACX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QKACX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: QKACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). QKACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.50 vs. RWMFX (7.95). QKACX return over 5 years is better than : 63.43 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| QKACX | RWMFX | QKACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.31 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.002 | 8.213 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.43 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.50 | 7.95 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.01 | 34.82 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.43 | 50.81 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.68 | 83.34 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement