Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKACX vs RWMFX
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$50.88
Change-$0.15 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.43
Change-$0.15 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.49B
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. QKACX (2.44B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QKACX: RWMFX (1.46) vs QKACX (0.41). QKACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QKACX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QKACX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: QKACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). QKACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.82 vs. RWMFX (6.61). QKACX return over 5 years is better than : 61.70 vs. RWMFX (49.87).
| QKACX | RWMFX | QKACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.31 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.927 | 7.164 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 203B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.46 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.82 | 6.61 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 24.20 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.70 | 49.87 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.41 | 70.91 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement