Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKACX vs RWMFX
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$51.77
Change-$0.29 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.35
Change-$0.38 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.3B
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. QKACX (2.67B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QKACX: RWMFX (1.43) vs QKACX (0.40). QKACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QKACX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). QKACX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: QKACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). QKACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.79 vs. RWMFX (5.42). QKACX return over 5 years is better than : 71.82 vs. RWMFX (56.65).
| QKACX | RWMFX | QKACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.31 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.570 | 9.070 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.43 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.79 | 5.42 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.63 | 45.07 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.82 | 56.65 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.93 | 93.54 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement