Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKACX vs RWMFX
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts QKACX vs RWMFX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
Price$51.44
Change+$0.16 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.82B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
QKACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKACX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. QKACX (2.82B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than QKACX: RWMFX (1.41) vs QKACX (0.39). QKACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: QKACX (19 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). QKACX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). QKACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). QKACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: QKACX (0) vs RWMFX (250). QKACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.10 vs. RWMFX (4.59). QKACX return over 5 years is better than : 54.42 vs. RWMFX (45.02).
| QKACX | RWMFX | QKACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.31 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.31 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.181 | 8.905 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.41 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | 4.59 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.59 | 29.92 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.42 | 45.02 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.26 | 72.75 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement