Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKBGX vs RLBCX
QKBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QKBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced R6
Price$23.77
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.61M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.38
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
QKBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKBGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. QKBGX (294M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QKBGX: RLBCX (1.53) vs QKBGX (1.45). QKBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QKBGX (19 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QKBGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: QKBGX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. QKBGX (4.61). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.51 vs. QKBGX (28.27).
| QKBGX | RLBCX | QKBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.89 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.89 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.687 | 13.042 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.53 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | 9.65 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.52 | 41.75 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.27 | 41.51 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.92 | 75.50 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement