Ad is loading...
QLC vs SPY
QLC vs SPY Comparison
Open Charts QLC vs SPY
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap ETF
Price$65.03
Change+$0.71 (+1.10%)
Volume$1.45K
Net Assets409.64M
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
Price$565.06
Change+$3.91 (+0.70%)
Volume$65.13M
Net Assets573.93B
QLC vs SPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLC vs. SPY commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLC is a Buy and SPY is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 574B vs. QLC (410M). QLC has a higher annual dividend yield than SPY: QLC (-2.941) vs SPY (-3.297). QLC was incepted earlier than SPY: QLC (10 years) vs SPY (32 years). SPY (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than QLC (0.25). QLC has a higher turnover SPY (3.00) vs SPY (3.00).
| QLC | SPY | QLC / SPY | |
| Gain YTD | -2.941 | -3.297 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 410M | 574B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.09 | 265% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 3.00 | 533% |
| Yield | 1.06 | 1.29 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 32 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QLC | SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLC has been closely correlated with WAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLC jumps, then WAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLC | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| WAB - QLC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ZBRA - QLC | 74% Closely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| CRBG - QLC | 73% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| FLEX - QLC | 71% Closely correlated | +3.21% | ||
| SYF - QLC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||