QLD
Price
$89.12
Change
-$2.65 (-2.89%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
13.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ROM
Price
$139.97
Change
-$5.91 (-4.05%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
1.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs ROM

QLD vs ROM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) are 2x leveraged ETFs from the same issuer targeting daily results, resulting in similar expense ratios of 0.95% and high volatility profiles.
  • QLD delivers 2x daily exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, providing broader technology and growth-oriented coverage across approximately 100 holdings with significant allocations to communication services and consumer discretionary sectors.
  • ROM offers 2x daily exposure to a dedicated U.S. technology sector index, resulting in a more concentrated pure-play technology portfolio with fewer holdings and heavier weighting toward semiconductor and hardware companies.
  • Structural similarities include daily leverage reset mechanics, which can lead to compounding effects over longer periods, while differences in index composition drive distinct sector exposures and relative performance drivers.
  • Both ETFs suit investors seeking amplified short-term exposure to technology themes but carry elevated risks due to leverage, including potential for significant losses in volatile or sideways markets.
  • Cost structures are identical, making differentiation hinge primarily on index breadth versus sector purity rather than fees.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) represent two leveraged strategies within the technology growth space. While they do not compete directly as substitutes, they offer alternative pathways to amplified exposure in overlapping but differentiated segments of the equity market. Investors comparing the pair often seek to understand how broader Nasdaq-100 leverage stacks up against concentrated technology-sector leverage when positioning for growth-oriented themes amid evolving market cycles.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is a passively managed leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund typically holds around 100 securities, reflecting the composition of its underlying index. Top holdings generally include major technology names such as NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., and Meta Platforms Inc. Sector allocations emphasize technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a daily-reset leveraged product, it employs swaps and other derivatives to achieve its target multiple, with rebalancing occurring daily to maintain the 2x exposure.

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) Overview

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is a passively managed leveraged ETF targeting daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. The fund maintains a more concentrated portfolio focused exclusively on U.S. technology companies, typically with fewer holdings than broader market indexes. Prominent positions often feature NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Broadcom Inc., and other semiconductor and software leaders. Sector exposure is overwhelmingly technology. The expense ratio is 0.95%. Like its counterpart, ROM utilizes daily leverage resets and derivatives to deliver its stated multiple.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to be shaped by advancements in artificial intelligence, semiconductor demand, cloud computing expansion, and digital transformation initiatives across industries. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories, corporate capital expenditure cycles, and global supply chain dynamics influence capital flows into technology equities. Regulatory developments around data privacy, antitrust scrutiny, and export controls on advanced chips represent ongoing considerations. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where sector momentum and earnings growth from leading technology firms serve as primary performance drivers over extended periods.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the two ETFs have exhibited correlated yet differentiated behavior tied to their underlying indexes. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) benefits from the diversified growth exposure within the Nasdaq-100, capturing contributions from non-technology leaders during broader rallies. ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) tends to amplify movements driven purely by technology earnings and sector rotation. Volatility differences arise from ROM’s higher concentration, potentially leading to sharper swings during technology-specific news events compared with QLD’s somewhat broader base. Relative positioning favors one or the other depending on whether investors prioritize index breadth or dedicated sector intensity.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) may hold a modest probabilistic edge in the current environment due to its pure technology-sector focus and alignment with concentrated momentum in semiconductor and hardware leaders. However, ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) offers greater diversification within growth equities, potentially providing more consistent exposure across multiple technology-adjacent sectors. The choice ultimately depends on an investor’s preference for sector purity versus broader index representation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. ROM commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and ROM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.7B vs. ROM (1.26B). ROM has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: ROM (48.471) vs QLD (26.684). QLD was incepted earlier than ROM: QLD (20 years) vs ROM (19 years). QLD (0.95) and ROM (0.95) have comparable expense ratios . ROM has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
QLDROMQLD / ROM
Gain YTD26.68448.47155%
Net Assets13.7B1.26B1,088%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.95100%
Turnover16.0069.0023%
Yield0.120.1483%
Fund Existence20 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDROM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ROM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRCO14.870.62
+4.35%
YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF
XSHD14.220.30
+2.16%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Hi Div Low Vol ETF
YMAX7.820.07
+0.90%
YieldMax Universe Fund Of Option Inc ETF
EVSD51.080.06
+0.12%
Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF
ANGL29.22-0.02
-0.07%
VanEck Fallen Angel HiYld Bd ETF

QLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLD
1D Price
Change %
QLD100%
-2.89%
LRCX - QLD
73%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
NVDA - QLD
70%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
KLAC - QLD
68%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
MU - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
ASML - QLD
67%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
More

ROM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROM has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROM jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROM
1D Price
Change %
ROM100%
-4.05%
NVDA - ROM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
LRCX - ROM
74%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
MU - ROM
71%
Closely correlated
-6.69%
AVGO - ROM
71%
Closely correlated
-3.67%
KLAC - ROM
70%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
More