Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VRTIX
QLSCX vs VRTIX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VRTIX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$30.29
Change+$0.33 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index I
Price$381.40
Change+$3.93 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.58B
QLSCX vs VRTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VRTIX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Hold and VRTIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRTIX has more cash in the bank: 13.6B vs. QLSCX (1.51B). VRTIX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VRTIX (1.20) vs QLSCX (0.32). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VRTIX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VRTIX (15 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VRTIX (0.07). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VRTIX (12.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VRTIX: QLSCX (0) vs VRTIX (5000000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. VRTIX (12.43). QLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.30 vs. VRTIX (52.75).
| QLSCX | VRTIX | QLSCX / VRTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.938 | 10.623 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 13.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.20 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.36 | 12.43 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.04 | 46.33 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.30 | 52.75 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 120.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement