Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QLSCX vs VSMAX
QLSCX vs VSMAX Comparison
Open Charts QLSCX vs VSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6
Price$29.91
Change-$0.13 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
Vanguard Small Cap Index Admiral Shares
Price$122.39
Change-$0.15 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
QLSCX vs VSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QLSCX vs. VSMAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLSCX is a Buy and VSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSMAX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. QLSCX (1.51B). VSMAX pays higher dividends than QLSCX: VSMAX (1.31) vs QLSCX (0.33). QLSCX was incepted earlier than VSMAX: QLSCX (9 years) vs VSMAX (25 years). QLSCX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VSMAX (0.05). QLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VSMAX (13.00). QLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSMAX: QLSCX (0) vs VSMAX (3000). QLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. VSMAX (10.49). QLSCX (68.07) and VSMAX (66.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QLSCX | VSMAX | QLSCX / VSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.05 | 1,760% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.05 | 1,760% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.006 | 6.588 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.31 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.98 | 10.49 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.46 | 39.11 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.07 | 66.40 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement