QMID | VOT | QMID / VOT | |
Gain YTD | 1.833 | 12.327 | 15% |
Net Assets | 1.38M | 32.4B | 0% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.07 | 543% |
Turnover | 50.00 | 21.00 | 238% |
Yield | 1.14 | 0.61 | 186% |
Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
QMID | VOT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago86% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MCH | 27.16 | 0.33 | +1.24% |
Matthews China Active ETF | |||
NEAR | 51.04 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF | |||
KFEB | 25.73 | N/A | N/A |
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Feb | |||
EMHY | 39.51 | -0.05 | -0.13% |
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yld Bd ETF | |||
LEXI | 33.27 | -0.13 | -0.38% |
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMID has been loosely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMID jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QMID | 100% | -0.19% | ||
AIT - QMID | 43% Loosely correlated | -6.45% | ||
SEIC - QMID | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
CSW - QMID | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
EXP - QMID | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
BCC - QMID | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VOT | 100% | -0.18% | ||
ARES - VOT | 81% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
APO - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
TRMB - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
OWL - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
CPAY - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More |