Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QMID vs VOT
QMID vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts QMID vs VOT
WisdomTree U.S. Mid Cap Quality Gr
Price$27.91
Change-$0.56 (-1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$287.58
Change-$1.51 (-0.52%)
Volume$209.25K
Net Assets32.29B
QMID vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QMID vs. VOT commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QMID is a Buy and VOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 32.3B vs. QMID (1.43M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than QMID: VOT (13.396) vs QMID (5.293). QMID was incepted earlier than VOT: QMID (2 years) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QMID (0.38). QMID has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| QMID | VOT | QMID / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 5.293 | 13.396 | 40% |
| Net Assets | 1.43M | 32.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.07 | 543% |
| Turnover | 50.00 | 21.00 | 238% |
| Yield | 1.10 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QMID | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QMID and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMID has been loosely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMID jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMID | 100% | N/A | ||
| AIT - QMID | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CSW - QMID | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| SEIC - QMID | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| DCI - QMID | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| CHH - QMID | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 81% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| APO - VOT | 80% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| OWL - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CPAY - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||