Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QMOM vs VOT
QMOM vs VOT Comparison
Open Charts QMOM vs VOT
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF
Price$64.81
Change+$0.56 (+0.87%)
Volume$273
Net Assets336.88M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$296.62
Change+$2.52 (+0.86%)
Volume$138
Net Assets33.08B
QMOM vs VOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QMOM vs. VOT commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QMOM is a Hold and VOT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VOT has more net assets: 33.1B vs. QMOM (337M). VOT has a higher annual dividend yield than QMOM: VOT (15.999) vs QMOM (0.209). QMOM was incepted earlier than VOT: QMOM (10 years) vs VOT (19 years). VOT (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than QMOM (0.29). QMOM has a higher turnover VOT (21.00) vs VOT (21.00).
| QMOM | VOT | QMOM / VOT | |
| Gain YTD | 0.209 | 15.999 | 1% |
| Net Assets | 337M | 33.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.07 | 414% |
| Turnover | 363.00 | 21.00 | 1,729% |
| Yield | 1.40 | 0.62 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QMOM | VOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 14 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMOM has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QMOM jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMOM | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| GS - QMOM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| KKR - QMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| ARES - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| APO - QMOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| HWM - QMOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
VOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOT has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOT jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOT | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| ARES - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| TRMB - VOT | 79% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| APO - VOT | 78% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CPAY - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| HLT - VOT | 76% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||