Advertisement
QNST vs ZD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNST is a Hold and ZD is a StrongBuy.
QNST | ZD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QNST's Valuation (43) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is in the same range as ZD (63) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that QNST’s stock grew similarly to ZD’s over the last 12 months.
QNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry is in the same range as ZD (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that QNST’s stock grew similarly to ZD’s over the last 12 months.
ZD's SMR Rating (32) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as QNST (35) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that ZD’s stock grew similarly to QNST’s over the last 12 months.
ZD's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as QNST (60) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that ZD’s stock grew similarly to QNST’s over the last 12 months.
ZD's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for QNST (100) in the Advertising Or Marketing Services industry. This means that ZD’s stock grew significantly faster than QNST’s over the last 12 months.
| QNST | ZD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 9 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 53% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QNST’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while ZD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- QNST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QNST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
QNST (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а +3.61% price change this week, while ZD (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -3.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -5.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
QNST is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
ZD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-5.09% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSTW | 5.18 | 0.28 | +5.71% |
| Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) | |||
| SMIZ | 41.39 | 0.46 | +1.12% |
| Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF (SMIZ) | |||
| EEE | 23.11 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Ethereum 75/25 Strategy ETF (EEE) | |||
| IYM | 177.63 | -0.50 | -0.28% |
| iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) | |||
| DECO | 72.64 | -0.62 | -0.84% |
| State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) | |||
QNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QNST has been loosely correlated with DV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QNST jumps, then DV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QNST | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| DV - QNST | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NEXN - QNST | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| MGNI - QNST | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| TZOO - QNST | 35% Loosely correlated | -4.73% | ||
| ZD - QNST | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.00% | ||
More | ||||
ZD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZD has been loosely correlated with DLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZD jumps, then DLX could also see price increases.