Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTAX vs RBGEX
QNTAX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RBGEX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$39.03
Change+$0.18 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.22M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$28.33
Change+$0.16 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.56B
QNTAX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RBGEX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. QNTAX (39.2M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: QNTAX (0.93) vs RBGEX (0.00). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RBGEX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.18 vs. QNTAX (-2.60). RBGEX (35.02) and QNTAX (34.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QNTAX | RBGEX | QNTAX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.172 | 14.234 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2M | 23.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | 13.18 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.67 | 43.18 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.30 | 35.02 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement