Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTAX vs RBGEX
QNTAX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RBGEX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$37.57
Change+$0.12 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.26M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$27.46
Change+$0.10 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.94B
QNTAX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RBGEX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a StrongBuy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. QNTAX (38.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: QNTAX (0.94) vs RBGEX (0.00). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RBGEX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. QNTAX (-7.71). RBGEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.62 vs. QNTAX (36.90).
| QNTAX | RBGEX | QNTAX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.130 | 10.726 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.3M | 22.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.71 | 7.90 | -98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.71 | 45.45 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.90 | 40.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement