Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTAX vs RBGEX
QNTAX vs RBGEX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RBGEX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$40.42
Change-$0.22 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.31M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2E
Price$29.13
Change-$0.17 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.71B
QNTAX vs RBGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RBGEX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Buy and RBGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGEX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. QNTAX (41.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RBGEX: QNTAX (0.75) vs RBGEX (0.00). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RBGEX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RBGEX (11 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RBGEX (1.17). RBGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RBGEX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RBGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.66 vs. QNTAX (0.18). RBGEX (38.97) and QNTAX (37.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| QNTAX | RBGEX | QNTAX / RBGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.575 | 17.460 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.3M | 24.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 13.66 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 60.56 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.74 | 38.97 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement