Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTAX vs RGSFX
QNTAX vs RGSFX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGSFX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$40.42
Change-$0.22 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.31M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R5E
Price$29.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.71B
QNTAX vs RGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGSFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Buy and RGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGSFX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. QNTAX (41.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGSFX: QNTAX (0.75) vs RGSFX (0.56). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGSFX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RGSFX (10 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RGSFX (0.52). RGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGSFX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. QNTAX (0.18). RGSFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.56 vs. QNTAX (37.74).
| QNTAX | RGSFX | QNTAX / RGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.52 | 298% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 0.52 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.575 | 18.081 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.3M | 24.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.56 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 14.58 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 63.36 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.74 | 42.56 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement