Ad is loading...
QNTAX vs RGWBX
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$32.18
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.28M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$22.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.74B
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 18.7B vs. QNTAX (33.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTAX (1.20) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTAX (8 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTAX (1.53) and RGWBX (1.46) have similar cost to investors . RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.43 vs. QNTAX (-12.83). QNTAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.17 vs. RGWBX (32.17).
| QNTAX | RGWBX | QNTAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.46 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.46 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.604 | -9.449 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.3M | 18.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.83 | -2.43 | 527% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.16 | 0.36 | -3,101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.17 | 32.17 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers