Ad is loading...
QNTAX vs RGWBX
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$35.75
Change-$0.58 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.86M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$24.98
Change-$0.51 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.13B
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. QNTAX (36.9M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTAX (1.51) vs RGWBX (0.08). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTAX (8 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. QNTAX (-2.00). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.41 vs. QNTAX (4.84).
| QNTAX | RGWBX | QNTAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.427 | 2.629 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.9M | 21.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.08 | 1,910% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.00 | 9.18 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.30 | 12.72 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.84 | 29.41 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers