Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QNTAX vs RGWBX
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$38.09
Change+$0.32 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.77M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.08
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.23B
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. QNTAX (38.8M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTAX (0.93) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. QNTAX (1.30). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.31 vs. QNTAX (32.15).
| QNTAX | RGWBX | QNTAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.054 | 11.257 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.8M | 23.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.30 | 17.53 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.23 | 33.32 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.15 | 35.31 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement