Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
QNTAX vs RGWBX
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$41.41
Change-$0.43 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.47
Change-$0.41 (-1.58%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a StrongSell and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 20.2B vs. QNTAX (37.9M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTAX (1.51) vs RGWBX (0.08). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTAX (8 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.95 vs. QNTAX (24.77). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.81 vs. QNTAX (18.25).
| QNTAX | RGWBX | QNTAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.854 | 18.355 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.9M | 20.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.08 | 1,910% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.77 | 26.95 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.09 | -7.54 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.25 | 34.81 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers