Ad is loading...
QNTAX vs RGWBX
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$34.95
Change-$1.09 (-3.02%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.82
Change-$0.89 (-3.33%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.2B vs. QNTAX (37.8M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTAX (1.51) vs RGWBX (0.08). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTAX (8 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.46 vs. QNTAX (-0.33). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.12 vs. QNTAX (1.45).
| QNTAX | RGWBX | QNTAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.344 | 24.117 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.8M | 21.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.08 | 1,910% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.33 | 24.46 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.65 | 3.74 | -338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.45 | 36.12 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers