Ad is loading...
QNTAX vs RGWBX
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts QNTAX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Adviser
Price$35.40
Change+$0.91 (+2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.33M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$24.71
Change+$0.78 (+3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.4B
QNTAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QNTAX vs. RGWBX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTAX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 20.4B vs. QNTAX (35.3M). QNTAX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: QNTAX (1.19) vs RGWBX (0.00). QNTAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: QNTAX (9 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). QNTAX (1.55) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QNTAX: RGWBX (250) vs QNTAX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.18 vs. QNTAX (-10.02). QNTAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.91 vs. RGWBX (42.23).
| QNTAX | RGWBX | QNTAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.46 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.631 | -1.684 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.3M | 20.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.02 | 2.18 | -460% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.49 | 21.39 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.91 | 42.23 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...