QNTQF vs RNMBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTQF is a Hold and RNMBY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QNTQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRNMBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QNTQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RNMBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QNTQF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNMBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QNTQF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RNMBY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QNTQF (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RNMBY (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -3.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.93%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (+1.40% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| QNTQF | RNMBY | QNTQF / RNMBY | |
| Capitalization | 2.9B | 28.5B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 293M | 1.54B | 19% |
| Gain YTD | 36.745 | 99.319 | 37% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.22 | 53.54 | 32% |
| Revenue | 1.98B | 8.83B | 22% |
| Total Cash | 195M | 474M | 41% |
| Total Debt | 392M | N/A | - |
QNTQF | RNMBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QNTQF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNMBY (52). This means that QNTQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNMBY’s over the last 12 months.
RNMBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQF (62). This means that RNMBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQF’s over the last 12 months.
RNMBY's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as QNTQF (65). This means that RNMBY’s stock grew similarly to QNTQF’s over the last 12 months.
RNMBY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as QNTQF (61). This means that RNMBY’s stock grew similarly to QNTQF’s over the last 12 months.
RNMBY's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQF (81). This means that RNMBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQF’s over the last 12 months.
| QNTQF | RNMBY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 31% | 3 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JFNAX | 68.27 | 0.07 | +0.10% |
| Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences A | |||
| MAAYX | 10.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley US Focus Real Estate A | |||
| EPVIX | 10.59 | -0.04 | -0.38% |
| EuroPac International Value I | |||
| MSCLX | 18.15 | -0.22 | -1.20% |
| MassMutual Small Cap Opps Adm | |||
| UOPIX | 117.04 | -9.09 | -7.21% |
| ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Inv | |||
QNTQF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QNTQF and AVNBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QNTQF and AVNBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QNTQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QNTQF | 100% | N/A | ||
| AVNBF - QNTQF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SAABY - QNTQF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
| RNMBF - QNTQF | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
| QNTQY - QNTQF | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
| RNMBY - QNTQF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||
RNMBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNMBY has been closely correlated with RNMBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RNMBY jumps, then RNMBF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RNMBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNMBY | 100% | -1.44% | ||
| RNMBF - RNMBY | 75% Closely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| FINMY - RNMBY | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| BAESY - RNMBY | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| THLLY - RNMBY | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| BAESF - RNMBY | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||