QNTQF
Price
$6.05
Change
+$0.20 (+3.42%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.44B
SAABY
Price
$24.47
Change
+$0.47 (+1.96%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
25.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

QNTQF vs SAABY

Header iconQNTQF vs SAABY Comparison
Open Charts QNTQF vs SAABYBanner chart's image
Qinetiq Group
Price$6.05
Change+$0.20 (+3.42%)
Volume$292
Capitalization3.44B
Saab AB
Price$24.47
Change+$0.47 (+1.96%)
Volume$72.21K
Capitalization25.93B
QNTQF vs SAABY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SAABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QNTQF vs. SAABY commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTQF is a Hold and SAABY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (QNTQF: $6.05 vs. SAABY: $24.47)
Brand notoriety: QNTQF and SAABY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QNTQF: 13% vs. SAABY: 40%
Market capitalization -- QNTQF: $3.44B vs. SAABY: $25.93B
QNTQF [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $3.44B. SAABY’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $25.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $248.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $18.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QNTQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAABY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QNTQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAABY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QNTQF and SAABY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAABY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SAABY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

QNTQF (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +5.22% price change this week, while SAABY (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +6.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+3.11% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAABY($25.9B) has a higher market cap than QNTQF($3.44B). SAABY has higher P/E ratio than QNTQF: SAABY (54.14) vs QNTQF (18.40). SAABY YTD gains are higher at: 134.054 vs. QNTQF (26.042). SAABY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.46B vs. QNTQF (293M). SAABY has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. QNTQF (195M). QNTQF has less debt than SAABY: QNTQF (392M) vs SAABY (10.2B). SAABY has higher revenues than QNTQF: SAABY (65.4B) vs QNTQF (1.98B).
QNTQFSAABYQNTQF / SAABY
Capitalization3.44B25.9B13%
EBITDA293M6.46B5%
Gain YTD26.042134.05419%
P/E Ratio18.4054.1434%
Revenue1.98B65.4B3%
Total Cash195M10.2B2%
Total Debt392M10.2B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QNTQF vs SAABY: Fundamental Ratings
QNTQF
SAABY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
492
SMR RATING
1..100
9058
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QNTQF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAABY (76). This means that QNTQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAABY’s over the last 12 months.

SAABY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQF (49). This means that SAABY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQF’s over the last 12 months.

SAABY's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as QNTQF (90). This means that SAABY’s stock grew similarly to QNTQF’s over the last 12 months.

SAABY's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as QNTQF (39). This means that SAABY’s stock grew similarly to QNTQF’s over the last 12 months.

SAABY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQF (58). This means that SAABY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAABY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDWGX11.830.06
+0.51%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc R6
RSENX21.580.07
+0.33%
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets Y
BMRRX34.48-0.03
-0.09%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity R
GCAVX19.46-0.11
-0.56%
GMO US Small Cap Value VI
PXWEX33.17-0.19
-0.57%
Impax Ellevate Global Women's Ldr Inv

QNTQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QNTQF and AVNBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QNTQF and AVNBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QNTQF
1D Price
Change %
QNTQF100%
N/A
AVNBF - QNTQF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAABY - QNTQF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
RNMBF - QNTQF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
QNTQY - QNTQF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
RNMBY - QNTQF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More

SAABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAABY has been loosely correlated with RNMBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAABY jumps, then RNMBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAABY
1D Price
Change %
SAABY100%
+1.96%
RNMBY - SAABY
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
BAESY - SAABY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
FINMY - SAABY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
RNMBF - SAABY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
HII - SAABY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More